FabGram.com

Modular Home Industry, Builder And Owner Information

Archive for the ‘Pre-Fab News’ Category

The Proof is in the Prefab

Posted by fabgram on 30 April 2007

Story by Allison Arieff

With herself as guinea pig, architect Michelle Kaufmann conducted the perfect prefab experiment: Design a house. Build one onsite, one in the factory. Watch what happens.

In the much-maligned, often-overhyped, and frequently misunderstood world of prefabricated construction, one of the most common questions asked is “Why prefab?” And there is perhaps no better answer to that question than architect Michelle Kaufmann’s first two Glidehouses—one prefab, one not.

The process of building the two homes simultaneously gave Kaufmann the perfect laboratory in which to hone her skills and perfect her process. “I’m done with site-built,” she says. “Going through this convinced me of the benefits of modular.”

Like many first-time home buyers, Kaufmann and her husband, Kevin Cullen, were frustrated by what the market had to offer. In the astronomically priced San Francisco Bay Area, where a modest single-family home for $750,000 is considered a “deal,” there were precious few houses in their price range—and those that were were not at all the sort of places they saw themselves living in. After months of Sundays spent trudging through open houses, Kaufmann, who’d recently left Frank Gehry’s architectural office, and Cullen, a builder and woodworker, changed their strategy. In the spring of 2003, they found land in Novato, California (25 miles north of San Francisco), on which to build their own home. “We were excited,” says Kaufmann, “and luckily naïve, not knowing what was ahead. Had we actually known, I think we would have been very afraid.”

Things began to move as rapidly as their search for land. A design had to be submitted within the 45-day escrow period. Cullen, who would act as general contractor, was pushing for as sustainable a house as possible.

“My 83-year-old Uncle Joe instilled a great respect for the outdoors in me and was the first person I ever heard talk about sustainable building,” explains Cullen. “So I’d been hearing about things like passive solar, photovoltaics, water catchment and renewable resources for years.”

“Sustainability is the driving force of what we do,” says Kaufmann of her firm, Michelle Kaufmann Designs (MKD). Accordingly, Kaufmann and Cullen opted for structural insulated panels (SIPs), believing they would offer the best insulation and save time and money in construction. However, the time and money part “ended up not being true,” says Kaufmann. So even as they proceeded with SIPs for their own home, they began to explore other alternatives that would offer the same level of sustainability—and the anticipated savings in time and money they’d hoped for—in future projects.

“During this time friends and colleagues were forced to listen to us talk about our house and its design,” says Kaufmann, whose affable manner no doubt made her tales of building woe intriguing to those in earshot. “Many were in similar situations and asked if I might do something like our house for them.” So in the summer of 2003, Kaufmann divided her time between building her own home and researching factory fabrication options.

Most factories Kaufmann contacted didn’t return her calls—an experience not uncommon among architects hoping to do modern prefab homes. Those factories that did respond did so quizzically, unable to understand why anyone would want such a house and, thus, why the factory would want to build one.

Realizing that for factories to even entertain her requests she’d have to prove the market was there, Kaufmann started working on a small website that described her project. Meanwhile, work continued on Kaufmann and Cullen’s own Glidehouse and it was slow going. Drawings needed revising, bids were coming in higher than original estimates, and because of a Bay Area building and renovating boom, subcontractors were hard to come by. By September, permits had been approved for Glidehouse #1 and Kaufmann’s website for the Glidehouses of the future went live.

By November 2003, site work, clearing, grading, and septic construction began on her house—and, as for the modular Glidehouses, says Kaufmann, “my faith and stalking finally paid off.” A mention on fabprefab.com helped: Factories began to show some interest, and Sunset magazine contacted her to discuss building a Glidehouse for their annual celebration weekend in Menlo Park, California. Just after Thanksgiving, Kaufmann got her first client for a modular Glidehouse (let’s call it #2) in the Lake Chelan area of Washington State: Andrew Reid, a branch manager and loan consultant with Countrywide, the largest home mortgage lender in the United States (which does not treat modular any differently than a traditional stick-built home).

“Both the incredible aesthetics of the Glidehouse and its sustainable construction were huge draws for us,” explains Reid. “Being prefab wasn’t really important, except in that it fit nicely with our time line.”

The trajectories of #1 and #2 began to diverge quite dramatically (see p. 176). Kaufmann was pleased to discover how many things could happen simultaneously with the modular project (i.e., bids could be reviewed while drawings were being approved for permits instead of waiting for that approval). But she and Cullen were both despondent that, by April 2004, the factory-built house was speeding past the SIPs house.

“Seeing Andrew’s completed house,” says Cullen, “was like seeing a dead relative come back to life. I returned to our own house, still in its framing stages, bare copper pipes and electrical wires sticking out from all the walls, wondering what the hell was taking me so long.”

As winter approached, Kaufmann and Cullen had to start paying their construction loan. Unable to afford both mortgage and rent, they moved into their not-quite-finished home. But by the end of 2004, they were settled, and immediately began enjoying their house, not to mention their $0 energy bills, thanks to the solar panels. (“We hooked into Pacific Gas & Electric, so we sell back on sunny days and buy back on gray days,” says Kaufmann.)

Kaufmann’s experience building #1 and #2 not only offered a lifetime’s worth of character building, it was integral in helping her to become one of the few contemporary practitioners to actually make modern prefab work as both a business and a way of building.

“When I told my wife that all homes might be factory-built in the future,” recalls Reid, “she thought I had lost my mind.” The incredible success of Kaufmann’s vision, however, made the Reids converts—and perhaps the rest of us, too.

Source

Posted in Pre-Fab News | Leave a Comment »

Pre-fab-ulous? Yes!!!

Posted by fabgram on 5 April 2007

ONARCHITECTURE – Pre-fab-ulous? Builder does it the Swedish way
By DAVE MCNAIR
April 5, 2007

The architectural dream of churning out factory-built houses the way Henry Ford churned out Model-Ts is nothing new. In fact, the curator of Assembly Required: Contemporary Prefabricated Houses, a show in Richmond last year, described the “prefab” house as “modern architecture’s oldest new idea.”

Indeed, Sears, Roebuck & Co. started its Houses by Mail program in 1908, and in the 1920s Buckminster Fuller introduced the futuristic precursor to his geodesic dome. Unfortunately (or fortunately for some), factory-built house designs, at least in America, seem not to have escaped the architect’s studio, and when they did, it was to create what Americans have learned to associate with the term “prefabrication”– double-wides, or the cheap manufactured contraptions seen sailing down interstates behind “oversize load” signs.

In the last decade, so-called modular and panelized houses have gained wider acceptance. Indeed, we’ve chronicled their development in these pages, showcasing the UVA architecture department’s successful ecoMod project, the growing use of factory-built SIPS panels, and most recently a factory-built ThermaSteel house ["Man of steel: Scouten touts new technology," March 8].

However, despite the success of these technologies, the stigma associated with prefab houses persists.

For example, when architect Alan Scouten built his house in Ivy of ThermaSteel, a combination of steel and styrofoam that has proven strong enough to withstand hurricane winds and provides superior insulation, a neighbor attempted to sue him because he believed the house was going to lower property values.

According to Swedish builder Per Sjolinder, that prejudice against prefab houses is uniquely American. In countries like Sweden and Japan, he says, prefabrication is the rule, not the exception.

“In Sweden, we have been building prefab houses on a large scale for 75 years, and today over 90 percent of all homes in the country are put together in a factory,” Sjolinder says, adding that factory-built houses have become a way to increase energy efficiency in a cold climate and lower housing prices in a country of high labor costs.

Indeed, as far back as 1985, The New York Times was touting Swedish mastery of the prefab house. At a development in the Hamptons, 50 Swedish “kit” houses went up in as many days, 1/50 of the time needed to build comparable stick-built houses. The combination of craftsmanship and technology impressed even a US government technology expert.

“The Swedes have basically taken the building craftsman and given him a lot of high-technology equipment,” Henry C. Kelly, a senior associate in the Office of Technological Assessment, told the Times. ”Essentially, they are hand-building a house, but doing it with high technology in a factory so they can do it quickly. There’s no question about the quality.”

On a beautiful hillside in Ivy, Sjolinder and his company, EuroHomes USA, are building two model houses– one 2,300 square feet and the other a whopping 6,200 square feet– that he hopes will showcase the best of what Swedish (and American, he points out) innovation has to offer. In addition, the ambitious Swede wants to create America’s first prefab factory operation building Swedish “closed-wall” panel houses. Eventually, Sjolinder says, he hopes to produce 500 to 1,000 homes a year.

As Sjolinder explains, closed-wall systems are much different from the panelized or modular construction most Americans are familiar with. In addition to being completely customized, the walls of both houses arrive with everything in them: windows, doors, electric and plumbing hook-ups, switches, hardware, any electronics, and even the exterior wall covering. Sjolinder says that once the design and components of a wall are chosen, 35 to 40 of them can be built in his factory in several hours, enough to construct the shell of his 2,300-square-foot model, which took only a day to raise.

Touring the unfinished houses, it’s virtually impossible to tell their components were manufactured in a factory. In fact, on close inspection, the walls reveal innovative details and materials. For example, instead of the wood shims normally found around a door casing to make it square, a standard practice in stick-built construction, adjustable bolts hidden in the door casing secure it to the frame, making it easier to adjust if the door becomes unaligned. Window sills can never rot because they are polished stone, and the Swedish-made triple-pane windows open and flip around ingeniously.

And, of course, since the electric and plumbing are already installed (inspections for both take place before the wall panels are delivered), there’s minimal subcontracting work involved. Still, Sjolinder points out that craftsmen are important to the process of piecing the house together and adding various details.

We also took note of the wall construction, which at first looked like a standard stick-built wall. Apparently, after years of using SIPS panel and other similar technologies, which have only begun to gain acceptance in the US, the Swedish building industry realized that they actually cause health problems.

“The houses we made were sometimes so ‘tight’ that moisture couldn’t go anywhere,” says Sjolinder. “And so we had problems with mold. People were getting sick. In Sweden, they tried to use machines to suck the air in and out, but they were often very expensive and added an air pressure to the inside of the house that wasn’t natural.”

The solution, he says, was to create a four-layer “breathing wall” encased in a thick Gore-Tex panel. Functioning much like the popular Gore-Tex jackets athletes love because they’re light, warm, and breathable, the walls provide the same kind of superior insulation that SIPS panels do, without trapping air inside the house. In fact, Sjolinder claims it should cost only $125 to $150 a month to heat and cool the 6,200-square-foot house.

From room to room, unusual details continue to catch the eye: drawers that cleverly require a post-toddler’s strength to open, hidden latches on doors to keep them from slamming shut, radiant heat beneath the basement floor to control moisture, “whispering floor” panels to block the sound of stomping feet, European-style gas water heaters that heat water as it passes through the system, and a stairway and ceiling posts milled from poplar trees on the property.

At the end of April, Sjolinder says, he’ll hold the first of several open houses to showcase his prefab models.

So might these models finally change American attitudes about factory built houses? If the excitement Sjolinder displays as he shows the house is any indication, it may not matter to him.

“I’ve been thinking about and planning this for nine years,” he says. “And I still think it’s fun.”

Source

Posted in Modular Homes, Modular News, Pre-Fab News, Pre-Fab Systems | Leave a Comment »

Pre-Fab Is Eco-Friendly

Posted by fabgram on 26 March 2007

Pre-Fab Building Could Cut Construction Waste By 90%
26 March 2007

Making components from timber frames to kitchens off-site can significantly reduce the overall amount of waste produced by the construction industry.

This was the finding of a report published by the Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP) this week which compares the waste levels of existing off-site construction with those of traditional methods and looks at areas where there is scope for growth.

According to the research, off-site manufacture already offers the construction industry benefits in terms of time and cost predictability, health and safety and skills.

However, the report suggests that there is the potential to make a significant difference to the amount of waste the industry produces.

Some of the biggest waste streams in traditional construction are packaging (up to 5%), timber (up to 25%) and plasterboard (up to 36%).

Up to a 90% reduction can be achieved by reducing wastes such as wood pallets, shrink wrap, cardboard, plasterboard, timber, concrete, bricks and cement by increasing the use of off site manufacture and modern methods of construction.

The report also identifies the key off site manufacture and modern methods of construction systems that offer significant opportunities to reduce waste levels on site, including:

prefabricated kitchens and bathrooms;

timber frame systems;

light steel frame systems;

structural insulated panels;

pre-cast concrete systems

The work also investigated sectors, which currently use relatively low levels of off-site manufacture, such as retail, the NHS, schools and private housing. Results showed that there is the potential to make substantial reductions of waste in these sectors, especially with so many large-scale projects in progress.

Mervyn Jones, WRAP’s construction programme manager for waste minimisation at WRAP said: “Off site manufacture has already been shown to provide a number of benefits to the construction industry, but we wanted to develop firm evidence that confirmed the potential benefits in terms of reducing the amount of waste the industry contributes to landfill.

“The results of the work are very positive and clearly demonstrate the opportunity to reduce waste through the uptake of off site manufacture and modern methods of construction, especially in some of the UK’s landmark projects, such as the Olympics, Thames Gateway and in single or key worker living projects.

“Increased use of off site manufacture and modern methods of construction could help the industry take serious steps towards achieving the target of reducing waste to landfill by 50% by 2012.”

Decisions to use alternative construction methods to reduce waste can also form part of Site Waste Management Plans, which are expected to become mandatory in 2008, helping to demonstrate a contractor’s commitment to minimising waste at the outset of a project.

Source

Posted in Pre-Fab News, Pre-Fab Systems | Leave a Comment »